» Apple has released a monumental amount of new features - iPhone OS 4.0, iAds, and more. See Engadget's coverage and Apple's official pages. (0)
Tagged / iphone
» The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights and freedoms organization, highlights some of the most worrisome details of Apple's 28-page iPhone Developer Program License Agreement. (0)
Apple’s Own Silicon: What It Could Mean for the Technology Sector and Apple
29 Jan 10 / by Mark Bao / Analysis, Technology / / Comments
Yesterday, as anticipated, Apple released their tablet product, the Apple iPad, with much fanfare and criticism. Amidst the technologies in the iPad, with the old (lithium-polymer battery technology, multi-touch) and new (iPad OS) was an important one: the Apple A4 chip.

In March 2009, about a year ago, Apple acquired Power Architecture fabless semiconductor chip company P.A. Semi. P.A. Semi aimed to build low-power, efficient, and fairly powerful chips to use in various applications. Then-CEO Dan Dopperpuhl noted that P.A. Semi aimed to develop chips that consumed ten times less power than conventional chips.
Now with their own in-house team to develop chips for them, Apple released the A4 chip, an ARM-based system-on-a-chip based on ARM Cortex A9 with an ARM Mali 5-series GPU. Rivaling other ARM-based SOAC platforms, like Qualcomm’s Snapdragon or Nvidia Tegra 2, it focuses, quite clearly, on mobile performance with very low power usage. P.A. Semi’s last product was the PWRficient chip, which was a dual-core Power Architecture-based chip that ran at 2GHz and consumed 5 watts (25 watts at peak) of energy.
What does the presence of an Apple-designed chip forewarn about the future of Apple products? There are a number of considerations with Apple designing their own chips. Here are some of them.
Approaching compete control of the computing experience
John Gruber of Daring Fireball noted something that Apple COO Tim Cook said in June:
“We believe in the simple, not the complex. We believe that we need to own and control the primary technologies behind the products we make, and participate only in markets where we can make a significant contribution.”
— TIM COOK
Indeed, through developing so much of their products in-house, like the battery, processor, and other key features, they’re finding ways to control the user experience of their products. And it’s working: their revolutionary lithium-polymer batteries coupled with the Apple A4 processor create not only a pretty dazzling graphics experience, but a long-lasting one. The ten-hour high load battery life and the one month standby (!) are indicative of Apple’s ability to take control of the experience—not to mention the presence of what could be an incredible amount of DRM and security built into the processor, moving from software security to hardware security.
Radical innovation has never been a trait that Apple has neglected to execute brilliantly on. But now, Apple is doing so by taking control of the entire computing experience, now even down to the silicon.
Radical differentiation from competition
Few technology companies try to specialize in the finer points in computing, namely the processor. Including Apple, until lately. The iPhone 3GS is powered by the ARM Cortex A8 ARM processor, with PowerVR SGX graphics. We haven’t really seen much that has been developed without ARM-manufactured chips, Intel, Qualcomm, or Nvidia.
Has the new chip scared the chip manufacturers? You bet, and it’s also had an effect on the top manufacturers. While Microsoft and Nintendo try to nonchalantly shrug off the iPad as ‘humorous’ and ‘unimpressive’, it is clear that Apple has something they don’t have: a few steps ahead in product technology. All of the mobile phone manufacturers are behind, and while they’re struggling to catch up in technology, Apple will be moving forward.
Limitless expansion of Apple products
With the Apple A4 processor, Apple set an example: with their in-house semiconductor team from P.A. Semi, they could not only design their own chip, but they could design a damn good one. This would allow for the limitless expansion of Apple products. While competitors are constrained by limitations like processor power and processor energy draw, Apple can get around these limitations. They’ve bought a company that allowed them to design an excellent, efficient processor. There are few things more difficult to design than the very processing center of a technology device.
Whenever the next iPhone comes out, we’ll see something like a 700MHz Apple-designed chip in it with a lithium-polymer battery, and when we find out how fast it is and the battery life, Apple competitors will be quite astounded. Repeat by applying knowledge gained from the A4 to a x86 architecture, with the MacBook, iMac, Xserve, and other future Apple products, and it’s clear that Apple could perhaps become the market leader in an incredibly large gamut of technology.
It’s more than a processor. It’s an indicator of how important Apple might be in the future to technology and to our lives.
» New research published by ChangeWave Research shows Google Android gaining incredible market share in the mobile operating system market, jumping from 6% to 21% penetration from September 2009 to December 2009. I've been bullish on Android for a while now, and this substantiates why. (0)
AT&T releases app to track dropped calls, and why it’s okay to say you’re wrong
07 Dec 09 / by Mark Bao / Mobile / / Comments
The largest predicament surrounding the iPhone (AAPL) seems to be the network: indeed, there seem to be a large number of dropped calls experienced by iPhone users lately, which until recently wasn’t really acknowledged by AT&T. Today, AT&T released an iPhone app that will track problems with the AT&T (NYSE:T) network.
Using this tool, users can pick a category of problem (dropped call, failed call, no coverage, data failure, poor voice quality) and a frequency of this problem occurring, which is sent to AT&T along with your GPS coordinates. This will allow AT&T to increase its attention towards problem areas in the network.
I never quite understood why companies believed admitting to and fixing a problem was difficult and undoable because of the admitting part. Through such a tool, AT&T gains many advantages. Let’s take a look.
- Users like that AT&T recognizes the problem.
- Users like that they took action and released an application to help fix the problem.
- AT&T gains many data points from millions of iPhone users—each with exact GPS coordinates to see which hives are the worst offenders—from which they can identify pain points and improve their network.
- In the end, users gain a better experience using AT&T as improvements stemmed from this app are issued.
AT&T not only was able to increase its public image and improve their network, but they were able to do so by crowdsourcing millions of AT&T iPhone users’ data, all pretty much free of charge.
Sometimes, it’s okay to admit you’re wrong—as long as you fix the problem. It shows responsiveness and shows that the company is trustworthy to the point where they—gasp—admit that they made a mistake.
Google CEO Eric Schmidt Resigns from Apple’s Board of Directors
03 Aug 09 / by Mark Bao / Business / / Comments
Pretty big industry news and general news as well right now, so we might as well report it. Apple (APPL) put out a press release today that Google (GOOG) CEO Eric Schmidt has resigned from Apple’s Board of Directors, due to conflict of interest between Google’s products and Apple’s products.
Apple CEO Steve Jobs:
“Unfortunately, as Google enters more of Apple’s core businesses, with Android and now Chrome OS, Eric’s effectiveness as an Apple Board member will be significantly diminished, since he will have to recuse himself from even larger portions of our meetings due to potential conflicts of interest. Therefore, we have mutually decided that now is the right time for Eric to resign his position on Apple’s Board.”
MarkJournal reported on the business relationship straining between Apple and Google earlier. This is the result, and there’s not much to say about the it, except that it’s an unfortunate break between two “good” powers.
I’m interested in seeing how far this goes, as both companies become bigger and bigger competitors against each other. You didn’t have an Apple vs. Google before — now you do. As companies grow into other areas, more conflict of interest problems arise in expansion.
When Business Alliances Become Ugly: Apple and Google Edition
28 Jul 09 / by Mark Bao / Business / / Comments
A few days ago, Apple (AAPL) removed various Google Voice apps from their iPhone App Store, as well as (speculated) Google’s own official Google Voice iPhone app, as they created in conjunction with the Google Voice apps for BlackBerry. Google (GOOG) Voice allows users to have a single phone number with Google, that allows it to ring multiple phones at once, receive voicemail in audio and transcribed text form, SMS sent through, and more. Apple said that the applications were duplicating the iPhone’s own functionality.
This is when business relationships, and specifically friendships or alliances, become ugly. Google’s CEO Eric Schmidt serves on Apple’s Board of Directors, and the relationship between the companies have been historically amiable. The two collaborated on the iPhone’s Google Maps feature as well as countless other Apple/Google related escapades in the past.
Alliances between technology companies can become rocky, as been described here. The only other alliance related to Apple’s Board of Directors is probably Intuit, which has a fat chance of being offended by an Apple action. (The other executives on Apple’s Board of Directors are in the sectors of clothing, skin care, biotech, and the like.) Although Eric Schmidt’s interest and influence over Apple as part of their Board of Directors is most likely limited, Schmidt must not be the happiest with the decision to pull the application.
What’s more important is the big picture: Apple is fearing Google is becoming a competitor in the area, because of their seemingly competing interests in the voice space. (Which makes absolutely no sense, because Google Voice is not replacing voice communication, for the time being, but facilitating improvements to it, which increases use of the voice network.) But it’s not really Apple for the most part.
It all boils down to one important alliance that changed a lot of things: AT&T (NYSE:T). Apple’s alliance (read: exclusivity contract) with AT&T constricts it within the rules of AT&T to validate that agreement, which I imagine wasn’t an easy thing to pound out. AT&T’s influence over the iPhone product and Apple in general is immense, and essentially caused the conflict of interest with Google.
Recently, Apple shafted Google by forcing them to make their new Latitude iPhone application an iPhone web app only, instead of a full-fledged iPhone app. As such, the application is limited in functionality. Apple reported that it would be confused with the Maps app.
This is part of an ongoing, and ongrowing feud between Apple and Google: Google now has their own mobile operating system and is constantly venturing into Apple territory. Let’s see how Schmidt responds to this.
It’s hard to choose friends when the candidates are at war.
Apple Anti-Jailbreak Efforts Evaded Again as iPhone 3GS Jailbroken
03 Jul 09 / by Mark Bao / Technology / / Comments
Gist: iPhone 3GS jailbroken despite Apple Inc.’s efforts to thwart jailbreak. Jailbreak, known as Purplera1n, done by 19-year-old George Hotz, an early iPhone modifier.
Despite Apple Inc. (AAPL)’s constant anti-jailbreaking efforts resulting in delays with every new device or upgrade, the community again has succeeded in jailbreaking the new iPhone 3GS, resulting in full access to the filesystem and ability to run unsigned software.
The new exploit, installable in Windows platforms to iPhone 3GS devices, is available immediately and is known as Purplera1n. The creator of the exploit is 19-year-old George Hotz, who was also the first to hardware-unlock the iPhone.
Interestingly, this comes before the full unlock by the main iPhone community software organization known as the iPhone Dev Team. They have a temporary solution, but only for those who do not wish to unlock their iPhone 3GS in the future.
Apple is continually patching the known methods of jailbreaking, unlocking, and other exploits that utilize the device for unauthorized purposes, and while they succeed in stagnating the time-to-delivery for jailbreaks and unlocks, the device eventually becomes exploited.

